Well, the standard of time predictions has improved hugely in the last few months. Twenty-two people ran this month's second version of the Watchless 4. Of those 22, 14 were within a minute of their predicted time, but 11 were within 20 seconds which is very impressive over the distance. The full results were;

Pos.	Name	Prediction	Actual	Difference
1=	Pete Mackrell	24:30	24:32	+0:02
1=	Charlie Thompson	30:00	30:02	+0:02
3=	Billy Mead	24:32	24:37	+0:05
3=	Tom May	30:00	30:05	+0:05
5	Pete Watkins	42:00	41:54	-0:06
6	Warren Rose	27:00	27:07	+0:07
7	Tom Inchley	27:21	27:30	+0:09
8=	Fiona Towell	35:40	35:26	-0:16
8=	Richard Inchley	38:12	37:58	-0:14
10	Tam Quinn	27:00	27:17	+0:17
11	Chris Williams	31:03	30:43	-0:20
12	Jordan Clay	26:47	26:19	-0:28
13	Chris Large	36:00	36:40	+0:40
14	Steph Nash	37:00	37:57	+0:57
15	Amy Inchley	35:40	34:30	-1:10
16	Deena Bland	36:00	37:11	+1:11
17	Dan Webb	29:00	30:45	+1:45
18	John Boulder	35:00	37:11	+2:11
19	Pat Neilan	36:00	33:45	-2;15
20	Charlie Mead	29:00	26:42	-2:18
21	Darren Tadman	36:21	33:38	-2:43
22	Lorraine Holloway-McLean	39:15	45:06	+5:51

 So the results don't really tell the story. Pete walked the last ten yards because he "knew" he'd run too quick. Charlie went the wrong way and yet was two seconds out. Hopefully everyone enjoyed the event, but if someone else would like to take the lead on another variation to our Wednesday nights, please put your idea forward.